[冷氣企管系列]國泰唔還優先股股息,會唔會爆煲?(圖:經濟日報,國泰航空第二度拖欠政府優先股股息(https://bit.ly/3fRqDVB))
1. 事忙,昨晚寫Patreon都六點先瞓,起身又見工(!)。「你都仲搵工?」。我冇搵工,但有人搵我。當然我唔係扮晒嘢話咩「人地咁有誠意咪應酬下佢」,幾有趣嘅role,但搞得掂先再諗。
2. 亦係我在我本書都有提,maximize your options.你揀人好過人揀你。唔知份工做唔做好?見咗先(前題係你可以鼠出去見工,或者在公司後樓梯zoom)。到人地出offer畀你你先慢慢諗。當然我呢啲講法,係HR同埋公司CEO嘅眼中釘。但我唔係為佢地服務,係為讀者服務嘛。對不?「所以我仲會教你返工搞自己嘢,好似你而家睇緊呢篇文咁」。大逆不道?理由同上。況且,公司炒你嗰時幾時會同你講感情?
==============
一週年!月頭訂最抵!比別人知得多。subscribe now(https://bityl.co/4Y0h)。Ivan Patreon,港美市場評點,專題號外,每日一圖,好文推介。每星期6篇,月費100,已經1900人訂! 畀年費仲有85折,20/40年費VIP 送本人著作一本。
==============
3. TLDR:冇得飛,邊有錢畀?而有得畀都唔會畀住。反正唔會罰息唔會起釘唔會有得清盤。又,到底你知唔知咩叫「優先股」?有得派息你咪優先過普通股293啲友,但冇得派嘅,一樣係冇。正如你鑽石菠蘿優先上機,當然可以打人尖—但架機唔嚟你都不能衝出跑道嘛。
4. 但講返,今日嘅主菜係國泰。大家知,「拖數」,爭政府嘅優先股股息。當然你睇啲評論,全部都係先有立場再塞啲嘢落去。
5. 好簡單,個講法當然係國泰好唔掂(而家先知?冇得飛可以點掂?),拖政府錢。「會唔會畀人起釘罰息清盤架?」。又或者話違約呀,政府啲錢掉晒落鹹水海,做咗傻仔呀咁。
6. 有立場唔緊要,問題啲嘢仲要係錯嘅,fit story into narrative,係我過去十幾年返工做嘅嘢。但都唔該專業少少嘛
7. 講真,成件事合理之極,一早估到。唔係馬後炮。點解一早估到?因為上一次都已經冇畀啦!你剛剛偷渡落嚟?咁上次爆咗煲未?清咗盤未?至於股價影響?零。上次仲要有得升添。我知股價「勁跌」1.5%,咁你堅持係受呢單嘢影響,隨你。不過可口可樂在C朗唔飲後就股價反彈。
8. 好啦,香港地,真係街市師奶都識講引伸波幅,我冇見過一個地方咁高水平。但同樣地,其實,大家知唔知咩叫「優先股」?你唔使好波過美斯先可以講美斯,但至少你應該識英文先可以評莎士比亞下話?
9. 當你乜都唔識,望文生義,其實都唔難。優先,唔等於包生仔嘛。優先登機,都要你隻機嚟咗先有得登嘛。有得派息的話,你咪優先過買普通股293嘅人,但冇派息你咪冇,有幾難明?包有得派息嘅叫債券。我知,總有啲人要拗,咩呀,債券都可以違約。當然可以,但債券唔派息係有後果的,就真係違約,分分鐘可以清你盤。但優先股唔派息?近乎冇後果(唔係完全冇,陣間講)
10. 同樣,優先股嘅,大吉利事公司清盤嘅,賣餐車賣制服之類,你咪優先過啲普通股293股東拎錢—但當然後過債權人,即係銀行呀,恭應湘呀之類。
11. 唔望文生莪呢?咁你唔識Google,唔識英文,應該都識中文架可(雖然我發現越嚟越多文盲上網)。咁你咪睇下原本約嘢,「合約精神」嘛(*),我唔懂事基本上都白紙黑字(https://bit.ly/3lMzLPd)
12. 合約寫明,延遲派優先股股息,「可以因為任何原因」—細心諗下,「可以因為任何原因」,亦即係「唔使任何原因」。近乎冇任何懲罰,唔會違約,冇得清盤,冇得告,唔會罰息唔會起釘。
13. 但係咪全無後果?又唔係。簡單嚟講,舊數未清新數免問。你優先股股息可以拖,但不能走數(破產都要走,不過係找咗其他債主先),一路積上去,雖然唔使額外罰息。
14. 仲有,只要你仲拖欠一個仙嘅優先股股息,你公司就不能派息,亦不能回購股份,亦不能贖回其他債務。唔係咩叫「優先」?呢個亦係好重要嘅考慮,例如呢個情況,優先股股東係政府,不能公帑借錢/入股畀你,然後你拎去派息或回購,益咗高層或其他基金之類。同樣地,亦不能係我公帑借錢畀你,你就用舊錢去贖其他債。(實務上,就睇啲seniority,係咪Pari passu之類。講句拉丁文即時好撚型)(**)
15. 另外,延遲派優先股息,好合理。首先冇咁嘅能力,都冇得飛,派條毛?況且,就算有,國泰亦都冇意慾去畀。正如有錢還都可以唔還,「你都試過借錢畀人,然後個朋友一年去幾次日本,但話冇錢還畀你」
16. 因為,反正冇罰息,咁仲乜要咁早還?頭先講話冇得派息冇得回購,但咁情況,冇優先股都唔會諗呢啲嘢啦。所以梗係拖住先。
17. 記住啦,踢波嘅嘢,根本好簡單。前面入多啲波,後面唔好失波。正經,做生意嘅嘢,我都講過,其實唔難,Buy low sell high collect early pay late avoid tax.「你MBA畀百萬學費都係學呢啲咋」
18. 仲有,都係文件有講。頭3年,優先股息係3厘。高定低任你講,但肯定係,頭3年都係咁嘅息,我做乜要1年就畀?(睇多次上面句金句)。冇錯,之後加上去,第四年5厘,第五年7厘。第六年開始9厘息。
19. 呢個設計,固然係會令國泰唔會好快還,但亦「迫」佢唔好一路唔贖。好簡單,去到第6年,捱9厘息—我估到時公司出面發債都唔使9厘啦,咁我出面借錢,然後贖咗啲優先股咪得(當然找埋啲未找嘅息)。呢個設計就係等國泰唔好無了期咁爭住舊錢
20. 呢個時勢,幫政府講好嘢真係等於自殺,我亦唔會做打手,又唔係有錢收,況且我個良心都好大。但真係要講,傾呢堆terms嘅人,或者出面幫手搞嘅金融撚,都至少有用過下腦。唔會係啲terms搵鳩政府笨益晒國泰。咁固然係街外啲金融撚法律撚搞,但至少呀邊個(劏房波?)都要過下目。啲terms係合理嘅,襟蚊business practice
21. 你特別見到,啲設計點樣去畀唔同嘅誘因,encourage 或discourage 你做不同嘅嘢。例如要找咗優先股先,等你冇得回購益高層或出面基金(美國啲公司之前畀人鬧到七彩)。例如第6年要9厘息,近乎係「迫」你贖返佢。全部都有佢嘅原因
22. 好多商業問題,都係principal agency 問題(唔知中文叫乜,我都係譯做「Meg Ryan除衫問題」—如果套戲(In the cut)咁好,點解Nicole Kidman自己唔去除衫,要老點朋友?)
23. 呢個亦係我本書講嘅嘢,唔同遊戲有唔同規則,從而去限制或鼓勵你做唔同嘅嘢。讀書係咁,打工係咁,甚至溝女,投資都係咁。不過有啲規則寫得明,有啲遊戲易玩。有啲遊戲係「潛規則」(唔係指嗰啲潛規則,但亦包括嗰啲潛規則),冇人話你知。對我嚟講讀書遊戲易玩,規則簡單明確,話明你知。但其他遊戲就靠你自己摸,因為設局嗰個都未必話到你知。
(*)見一次屌一次,係香港(定大中華?)地區先有「尊重合約精神」呢啲咁撚搞笑嘅講法。我冇見任何鬼媒會咁講。合約「精神」唔使你「尊重」的,你唔守咪上法庭,十分簡單。
(**)話說我朋友做airline,都幾大粒,有次同佢一齊坐啲平價飛,「士大夫飛」或稱「乞兒飛」,就真係去到機場望天打掛,要望有人no show。呢啲飛當然在食物鏈低層,但最好笑係好似十三張咁,有晒唔同排位,畀錢嘅客當然最先,乜乜白金會員更先。然後去到乞兒飛都仲有高級乞兒同低級乞兒,例如前面嗰個係老臣子 CXO,你係入職半年嘅小薯,咁得一個位,你估邊個上先?完全係一條歧視鏈。好難受呀?「咁你畀錢買張飛」,就好似橋牌trump卡咁,一張平價econ Trump死人地隻紅心A(當然實際上可以好多其他安排,舉例啫)
==============
一週年!月頭訂最抵!比別人知得多。subscribe now(https://bityl.co/4Y0h)。Ivan Patreon,港美市場評點,專題號外,每日一圖,好文推介。每星期6篇,月費100,已經1900人訂! 畀年費仲有85折,20/40年費VIP 送本人著作一本。
==============
同時也有6部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過8萬的網紅開水小姐,也在其Youtube影片中提到,"Take Me Right Now"融合了80年代的Disco風格, 顛覆以往開水小姐較為開朗的形象,由粉內帶領,踏入新的舞曲風格。 這首歌藉由釋放自己的性感魅力,勇敢地踏入未知的神祕戀情之中盡情享受。 之中吳了描繪初識時所經歷的冒險,進而帶入各種試探性的調情推拉 最後讓情緒完全的發散而裸出,完...
「fit into中文」的推薦目錄:
- 關於fit into中文 在 Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於fit into中文 在 Facebook 的精選貼文
- 關於fit into中文 在 黃之鋒 Joshua Wong Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於fit into中文 在 開水小姐 Youtube 的最讚貼文
- 關於fit into中文 在 Kevin 英文不難 Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於fit into中文 在 粒方不插電 Youtube 的最讚貼文
- 關於fit into中文 在 fit in意思的推薦,YOUTUBE和網路上有這些評價 的評價
- 關於fit into中文 在 完美的居家訓練(中文字幕) - YouTube 的評價
fit into中文 在 Facebook 的精選貼文
[味將軍集團]屯門市中心已成太興王國。呢兩間(點煲 /亞參雞飯)都係!之前係「劉一手」。呢個舖位間間都做唔長,睇下太興接手又點。話時話,大姆指(安雅會談)執笠,不如頂埋佢?
加埋現有嘅太興,敏華,茶木,錦麗,靠得住,東京築地。不如包起個場好似「大食代」(Horrible 坡國中文)咁啦。
但我最撚不滿係(冇錯,一路鬧一路食,香港精神):做乜食煲仔飯冇得叫隔離舖海南雞?屌,咪自己集團!同一個廚房添分分鐘(未望),自己transfer pricing 搞掂佢啦!台灣啲舖都係咁。
同理,有一期返上環,我去信和「美心MX」食早餐,鍾意個排包。有次話賣晒,阿姐就叫我等一等- 然後有條友去同一個場嘅「美心西餅」拎咗一袋排包。inter segment sales 呀!
一如所有香港餐廳一樣(不獨太興,雖然佢地特別明顯),都係新開張食(好彩唔使排)- 因為之後必定走樣。
又,都係在傷言傷。重災區?你老味太與賺1.2億呀,升五成!災what?
但當然多得「保就業」,立咗1.6億!即係,冇「保就業」就蝕錢(ceteris paribus 唔炒人的話)
唔止,仲要大增派息!派8000萬!左翼(膠?)論述就係拎1.7億保就業 去派息益股東同陳生。
當然右翼(市場撚)又話你知,邊係「嗰舊錢」,「嗰舊錢」拎咗去出糧嘛。咁慳咗出糧錢咪有錢賺,公司拎保就業係咪一定要蝕錢唔可以有純利?好似唔係。咁公司賺錢點解唔派得息?
(最左,美國Warren Sanders嗰啲其實話要派息!唔畀回購,因為派息政府會抽稅)
我睇法嘛,拗呢啲根本浪費時間。都係narrative. Fit into story。
係喎,Patreon就寫呢啲。記得訂
PS:煲仔飯正常,可跟進。屯門市中心咋大佬,美食地獄呀,what can you expect。
牛年比別人知得多。subscribe now.
Patreon.com/ivanliresearch
fit into中文 在 黃之鋒 Joshua Wong Facebook 的最佳貼文
【After Winning Majority in LegCo: Beijing's Crackdown May Trigger International Intervention】
***感謝Hong Kong Columns - Translated,將我早前撰寫『議會過半想像:以「#國際攬炒」反制「臨立會2.0」』長文(https://www.facebook.com/joshuawongchifung/photos/a.313299448762570/2887650867994069/)翻譯成英文,鼓勵國際社會關注立會選舉一旦過半的沙盤推演,在最惡劣形勢下的制衡策略。***
中文精簡版本:https://www.facebook.com/joshuawongchifung/photos/a.564294826996363/2888641404561682/
Hongkongers have experienced our revolution for over half a year. They no longer take a consequentialist view to the effectiveness of their movement as they did years ago, or waste time second-guessing the intentions and background of fellow activists. Following the defensive battles at CUHK and PolyU, November’s District Council election saw a great victory of unity. More marvellous is the union between peaceful and “valiant” protesters.
In the process of resisting tyranny, the people have realised that one cannot prioritize one strategy over another. This is also how the common goal of “35+” came into being—the hope that we will win over half of the seats in the Legislative Council (LegCo) this September, such that the political spectrum that represents the majority of Hongkongers is able to gain control of legislative decisions. The political clout of Hongkongers will increase if 35 or more seats are successfully secured on our side. It is certainly one vital step to achieve the five demands within the system.
The possibility of realizing legislative majority
Technically it is not unrealistic to win a majority even under the current undemocratic system. Back in the 2016 LegCo election, we already won 30 seats. In addition to the District Council (First) functional constituency seat that is already in the pocket of the pan-democrats, as long as the candidates in Kowloon East and New Territories West do not start infighting again, we could safely secure 33 seats based on the number of pan-dem votes in 2016.
The other 3 seats required to achieve a majority depend on democrats’ breakthrough among the functional constituencies by dispersing the resources of the Liaison Office. They also count on whether the turnout this September could exceed 71.2% — that of last year’s District Council elections. Some of the factors that could affect the turnout include: will the epidemic persist into the summer? Will there be potential violent repression of protests in the 2 weeks preceding the election? Will Hong Kong-US relations be affected by the downturn of the global economy?
Therefore, the ambition of “35+” is to be prioritised by the resistance as both a means and an end. I have already expressed my support for an intra-party primary at the coordination meeting. In the meantime, it is pleasing to see the ongoing debates reaching a consensus of maximising the seats among geographical constituencies in the upcoming election.
Whilst enthusiastic coordination, we should also assess the post-election landscape and gauge Beijing’s reactions: if we do not reach 35 seats, Hong Kong will be subject to tighter control and more severe repression by China; but if the democratic parties successfully form a majority in LegCo, CCP’s fears of a “constitutional crisis” would become imminent. Hence, the key questions are how the Pan-Democrats should deal with the volatile political situation in Hong Kong and how they are going to meet Beijing’s charge head-on.
Watching out for Beijing’s dismissal of LegCo after reaching majority
To take back control of LegCo such that it faithfully reflects the majority’s principles and needs is the definition of a healthy democracy. Recently, however, DAB’s Tam Yiu-chung has warned that the plan of the Pan-Dems to “usurp power” in the LegCo would only lead to Beijing’s forceful disqualification of certain members or the interpretation of the Basic Law. This proves that winning a majority in LegCo is not only a popular conception but also a realistic challenge that would get on the nerves of Beijing. Could Beijing accept a President James To in LegCo? These unknown variables must be addressed upon achieving a majority.
While there is no telltale sign as to Beijing’s exact strategy, we are already familiar with the way CCP manipulated the Basic Law in the past 4 years. Having experienced three waves of disqualifications in LegCo, twice kicked out of LegCo with my team, and thrice locked up in jail, I have no false hopes of an easy compromise from Beijing: they would not let Pan-Dems control LegCo for half a year and wait (as is the proper procedure) until after having negatived the Budget to dissolve the legislature, and thereby giving them an easy victory in the re-elections. The greater the Pan-Dems threaten Beijing’s rule in Hong Kong, the more likely that it will trigger Beijing’s repression.
Since the disqualification and arrest of lawmakers have already become “normalised”, one can even imagine the police stepping into the LegCo building to force Pan-Dems into voting. Neither is it beyond our imagination to expect the CCP to kick out all 70 lawmakers in a fit of rage and replace them with a provisional LegCo “2.0” [HKCT note: The first was from 25 Jan 1997 to 30 Jun 1998]. To depend on a majority that could lead to a chapter of a “new testament” for One Country, Two Systems is perhaps what many elites long for, but they are overly optimistic:for a ticket to the promised land will not be available at the Chief Executive election campaign a year and a half later.
Admittedly, the Pan-Dems cannot unilaterally initiate “Laam-chaau” [HKCT note: mostly translated into “scorched-earth” mentality or “mutual destruction”; some even translated into “If I burn, you burn with us”]. The most they can do is to force a standstill of the government, and not for long the LegCo will have been eliminated from the equation to make the wheels turn again. It all leaves the plan of “Negativing the motion → Dissolving LegCo → Re-election after re-election → the stepping down of Carrie Lam” merely as overly positive speculation, probably resulting from their overestimate of CCP's capacity for rational calculation. The Pan-Dems must guard their frontlines and recognise what the biggest threat from Hong Kong to China could be. In this case, should LegCo sessions be disrupted or suspended, the Pan-Dems would have to be well prepared to surmount the expected obstacles and prevent the disqualification crisis 4 years ago—a Catch-22 indeed.
Productive tension from global intervention: Using Laam-chaau against the CCP
What aggravates the CCP the most is the potential threat to Hong Kong’s unique status as the one and only “separate customs territory”. Any miscalculation will compromise its role as the Chinese economy’s “white gloves”. Imagine if CCP were to disqualify all 70 elected lawmakers and convene a meeting north of the Shenzhen River to pass a resolution to Hong Kong’s affairs (much like the Provisional Legislative Council “1.0" in 1997), how great will the shock be in a world with an effective Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act? However hard it is to predict the future one thing is certain: With the US presidential election just around the corner, blows to the separation of powers would not be tolerated, and the West would necessarily effect countermeasures against the Hong Kong government.
Beijing has been relying upon Hong Kong to navigate the international community for decades. While clamping down on the political freedom of the cosmopolitan city, Beijing desires to maintain the financial centre’s economic freedom. Hence, we started lobbying for the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act four years ago, and today we are determined to promote “Laam-chaau” on an international scale.
The will of the voters must be reflected in an election. If a “35+” legislature were to be dismissed and replaced, such flagrant violation of democracy would assuredly cause a greater backlash than the infamous extradition bill. Knowing what the reality ahead of us could be, we have to combine our election and international strategies to oppose the placement of a 35+ LegCo with an “Emergency Legislative Council 2.0”, to advance an international “Laam-chaau” to Hong Kong’s status as “separate customs territory”. Only then will we stand a chance to resist the regime and to realise the five demands.
Adjusting our mindset: Overcoming the “constitutional crisis” to reach a resolution
Upon the realization of the “35+” LegCo, it is expected that the CCP will launch a devastating counterattack. The Pan-Dems should not expect LegCo to run normally; neither can the lawmakers realise their governing blueprints they have for Hong Kong. Rather, candidates will be able to compete against one another with visions of a liberated Hong Kong through popular vote. Bringing this point up has nothing to do with undermining the common goal of reaching a majority in LegCo, but rather channels the battle of LegCo to positive use upon the rule of law’s death and a “constitutional crisis” ahead. Knowing that Hongkongers have nothing to fall back on, all Pan-Dems should not miss the only way to the realization of “35+”.
Thus, be they partisans, nonpartisans, incumbent politicians, amateur politicians, or the civil society as a whole – if we stay in the political discourse of 2016 and continue to perpetuate old stereotypes, that is to deal with the divisions on the pan-democratic camp by favouring the most “local” faction; to consider only resource allocation and self-aggrandizement as the purpose of a LegCo campaign; to ignore how potential lawmakers are fitted to what specific roles; to turn a blind eye to the journey of resistance since last summer (extending indefinitely into the future)—They would lead as astray and cost us lose a precious opportunity for change by winning a 35+ majority.
The extent to which the pan-democrats can stay united in light of the political atmosphere since last summer is another problem that our side must to address. Before the watershed moment of 12th June 2019, many democratic delegates were trapped in the mentality of needing to “preserve people’s livelihood”, “be content of what we have accomplished”, and other strategies that favours stability. As the government refuses to heed to the five demands, whether the democrats, especially those in the functional constituencies, have the political will to go all-in is the real difficult question that confronts us in the upcoming LegCo election.
All in all, if “35+” cannot be realised, it is unsurprising to see LegCo being more heavily suppressed in the next 4 years; even if "35+" is achieved, it is questionable whether the pan-democrats are able to weather multiple attacks, verbal or physical, from the regime (judging from its power in the last four years) and utilise the international Laam-chaau strategy against the displacement of LegCo. Adhering to the motto of “we fight on, each in his own way”, I can only hope that Hongkongers in elections, street confrontations and international front can reconcile with each other, so that we may collectively compel the government to yield to our demands in the next six months. It is only by reaching a resolution before a real constitutional crisis that we can combat the institutional violence of the regime and not be devoured by it.
https://hkcolumn.blogspot.com/2020/04/joshua-wong-after-winning-majority-in.html?fbclid=IwAR216gf53pG_j9JOpDfr2GItvjLfrFSekKTPzoEs3-s9KBqvPEwz865P8vw
fit into中文 在 開水小姐 Youtube 的最讚貼文
"Take Me Right Now"融合了80年代的Disco風格,
顛覆以往開水小姐較為開朗的形象,由粉內帶領,踏入新的舞曲風格。
這首歌藉由釋放自己的性感魅力,勇敢地踏入未知的神祕戀情之中盡情享受。
之中吳了描繪初識時所經歷的冒險,進而帶入各種試探性的調情推拉
最後讓情緒完全的發散而裸出,完全釋放。
--------
這次因為歌曲風格真的不是我擅長的類型
所以粉內特地請了幾個好朋友一起把充滿性感氛圍歌詞寫出
再由我重新組合調節出適合我自己語氣的歌曲節奏
不得不提到我認識多年的孟孟
他一直以來都是我心裡最有女人味的朋友之一
這次也一同參與了歌曲創作,真的太有趣了XD
然後我愛粉內,謝謝你們當初對我拋出橄欖枝
讓我有機會跟這麼棒的一對夫妻合作,
創作出了我從來沒想過的新面向。
愛你們,也期待我們之後可以有更多更棒的合作:D
---------
Take me right now
詞 孟慶而、蔡蔡、FI-Né
曲 謝似餘、FI-Né
誰的費洛蒙早埋伏伺機在角落
此刻只想要你屬於我
汗水不經意的悄悄滑落胸口
看你還能夠撐多久
海市蜃樓不小心讓你看見了花朵
抱歉最耀眼那朵是我
曖昧流動我們何不就 轉身 邂逅
哎 ~~~~互相客套
哎 ~~~~氣氛漸入高潮
哎 ~~~~你要不要
哎 ~~~~Take Me Right Now
就靠近我 就碰觸我 就不要想太多
就抬起頭 就親吻我 就霸道的擁有
就答應我 就不要唯唯諾諾
你別閃躲 你別做作 你在懷疑什麼
OH 別害羞 先攻或守 就不要想太多
OH 放輕鬆 我的心跳 就隨便你感受
OH 這節奏 憑感覺走 天衣無縫
Hey Lucky Boy 你輸了自己卻贏了我
All my band members hop in the ship
And every time that we go we be takin' a zip
And They just want to ride with us so we making it fit
Yeah they wanna come with us they be jumpin' in quick
Hell yeah go ahead and cop another zip
I got to keep goin' in 'cause I’m feelin' her hips
And I just want to glide with it so I’m goin' with this
If they want to keep goin' they be takin a risk
I loved mysteries so much that I turn into one (I turn into one)
I am all yours with no refunds
I just wanna feel your passion come over tonight (come over tonight)
and make a mess out of me
哎 ~~~~互相客套
哎 ~~~~氣氛漸入高潮
哎 ~~~~你要不要
哎 ~~~~Take Me Right Now
就靠近我 就碰觸我 就不要想太多
就抬起頭 就親吻我 就霸道的擁有
就答應我 就不要唯唯諾諾
你別閃躲 你別做作 你在懷疑什麼
OH 別害羞 先攻或守 就不要想太多
OH 放輕鬆 我的心跳 就隨便你感受
OH 這節奏 憑感覺走 天衣無縫
Hey Lucky Boy 你輸了自己卻贏了我
At the end of the night
I can feel it in my arms
I can feel it in my heart
I can feel it in my mind
I can feel it in her ways
I can feel it in her plans
I can feel it in a trance
I can feel it up high
You already know what it is
Give it to your heart
And then give in to mine
Make me wanna ride cuz we up at the top
Here I go again girl I just can’t stop
就靠近我 就碰觸我 就不要想太多
就抬起頭 就親吻我 就霸道的擁有
就答應我 就不要唯唯諾諾
你別閃躲 你別做作 你在懷疑什麼
OH 別害羞 先攻或守 就不要想太多
OH 放輕鬆 我的心跳 就隨便你感受
OH 這節奏 憑感覺走 天衣無縫
Hey Lucky Boy 你輸了自己卻贏了我
![post-title](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/284i5HRstMk/hqdefault.jpg)
fit into中文 在 Kevin 英文不難 Youtube 的最佳解答
你大學遇過恐怖的室友嗎?Teacher Kevin 在這次的英文 Podcast 分享網友在 Reddit 上訴說自己當年恐怖的遭遇。歡迎大家先不要看文稿,試著用聽的訓練自己的英文聽力。
訂閱:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-LfXeUtpvAczV1w1yTq4eQ
Podcast 連結
APPLE: https://podcasts.apple.com/tw/podcast/%E8%8B%B1%E6%96%87%E5%96%AE%E5%AD%97-%E7%89%87%E8%AA%9E-%E6%96%87%E6%B3%95/id1462457142
SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7wqKj2KnfHXLRa8AaIeyOn
上一部:恐怖大學室友 (1)|英文不難
https://youtu.be/ZpUJg_MBh7M
----文稿----
#1
I had two roommates that kept eating all of my food. Although classes haven't started, I had already moved into my dorm. One day, I made myself a peanut butter sandwich. I put my sandwich on the table, and ten minutes later, it was gone. My roommate ate it. About a week later, I decided to make myself another peanut butter sandwich. I opened my cupboard and saw that my roommates left an empty jar in my cupboard. I flipped out because who eats a whole jar of peanut butter, without introducing themselves? These girls would scarf down all my food, and complain if they thought anyone was touching their food. So I started buying really fattening food such as doughnuts, pies, cakes. I was trying to teach them self-restraint, but these girls would go through these boxes within two days. So I kept buying doughnuts and desserts. And then one day they started complaining about how they couldn't fit their jeans. Success. I also put laxatives in my peanut butter.
----單字----
dorm 宿舍
cupboard 櫃子
flipped out 暴怒
scarf down 狼吞虎嚥
fattening 增肥
restraint 節制
laxatives 瀉藥
#2
----文稿----
My roommate freshman year got completely hammered, came back to the room around 1 in the morning, and accused me of stealing the pudding in her fridge that she *had ate* an hour before she went out. She waited until I fell asleep and then stabbed me in the arm with one of those clicky pencils…I had to go to the hospital to get it cleaned/stitched. She got kicked out.
----單字----
freshman year 大一
hammered 嚴重酒醉
accused 指控
*had ate* 其實是錯的,應該是 had eaten。你有抓到嗎?XD
stabbed 捅
#3
----文稿----
I got absolutely hammered and pissed all over my roommates desk the night before the end of the year. I woke up to him hanging up his money to dry out. Years later he ended up as my boss and ended up giving me a significant promotion. I guess he doesn't hold grudges.
----單字----
pissed 尿尿
ended up 變成
significant 大、有份量的
promotion 升遷
hold a grudge 記仇
#4
----文稿----
It was move out day and my roommate was working on a paper last minute. I was packing my stuff. His parents walked in and were absolutely pissed that he wasn't packed yet. They immediately started scolding him while I was still in the room, but thankfully I had a final to go to and figured I'd dodge the storm. I said my goodbyes, assuming they'd be gone by the time I got back from my two hour final and went on my way. As it happens, my final only took twenty minutes so I got back much sooner than they'd have expected. I opened the door, saw my roommate bent over his bed with his bare ass showing just as his mom wound up for a spank. I quickly closed the door and went over to a friend's dorm until I felt safe enough to return. I never brought it up to him after that.
----單字----
paper 這裡是指報告
scolding 責罵
dodge the storm 避風頭
assuming 假設、預設
bare 沒穿衣服的、光溜溜
wound up 準備做某個動作
spank 打巴掌
bring something up 提及某事
*歡迎收聽全台灣最有趣的英文 Podcast。英文單字,片語,文法由 Teacher Kevin 主持,本節目可以在 Apple Podcast, Spotify 及所有 Podcast 平台上找到,無論搭車、騎車、打掃、運動,都可以邊做事邊學英文。
----------------------
#英文 Podcast #英文不難 #英文單字
![post-title](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/SyqnN0EkxjM/hqdefault.jpg)
fit into中文 在 粒方不插電 Youtube 的最讚貼文
又要來推坑阿滴桌遊啦!這次要來玩的是戰鎚冥土世界,有興趣的話可以點以下連結:https://www.warhammer-world.info/home/product_detail/15
Warhammer Underworlds is a tactical arena combat game. This is a system designed for balanced, small-scale tactical games that can be played quickly and easily by anyone, but which even experienced players will find challenging to master. The game rules are designed with competitive play in mind; matches can be played in under 45 minutes, on a smaller surface than our larger-scale games, and will be ideal for club or tournament play. And not only that, we’ll be fully supporting an organized play system for this game, right from day one.
The forces you can use in this game will be drawn from races across the Mortal Realms, including some for factions that have not received any new miniatures since we first ventured into the Age of Sigmar. Each of these sets will be composed of a small band of easy-to-assemble, push-fit miniatures in the style of our single-pose heroes to represent a specific band of warriors from that faction. These are provided in coloured plastic, and clip together, so you can quite literally be playing with them within minutes of opening the box with no glue or paint needed! (Though they do look great painted, and your dice will roll better – probably.)
The game is played using unique dice and card decks, and these will, to an extent, be unique to each faction. Both decks of cards used in the game are fully customisable – meaning you can choose to create all manner of combinations of overlapping abilities to use and objectives to achieve. This can be a really rewarding part of the game – and means that even the same faction can be played in wildly different ways. We’re expecting to see all sorts of combinations tried out at game stores, clubs and in tournaments.
希德塔的鏡像城市是幻想和瘋狂的噩夢,不斷變化的迷宮,無盡的樓梯,狹窄的街道和高聳的拱門。原來的城市失去了各種顏色和生命,幾千年來,它已經成為一種不詳的毀滅。那些踏入城牆的不幸,勇敢或莽撞的冒險家,穿過國界之間的帷幕,被困在鏡城之中。對於這樣的頑固的人,所有的希望似乎都失去了。
戰鎚40K
戰鎚
#戰鎚
規則錯誤部分如下:
●1:13-其實是鎚子,不是斧頭。
●8:17-首領讓攻擊擲骰重擲的能力,必須在投擲攻擊骰之前宣告使用。
●12:35-每輪的先後決定擲骰是四顆,不是五顆。
●12:56-阿滴的攻擊擲骰是1爆擊、1鎚、1劍,粒方的雖然也1爆擊,但比較完爆擊後,要比較一般成功的數量。索奧奇的攻擊行動是成功符號是鎚,阿滴還有1鎚,粒方已經沒有其他成功骰,所以該該次的攻擊行動是成功的。
●15:38-野獸人的激勵條件是敵方戰幫有兩名或更多鬥士陣亡,而不是全場。不過這是官方中文版本身印刷的問題(英文是正確的)。
![post-title](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/zUNWbJE8JzY/hqdefault.jpg)
fit into中文 在 完美的居家訓練(中文字幕) - YouTube 的推薦與評價
Fitting Room TW提供一對一的健身指導報名連結:https://goo.gl/NX7uNp想了解本影片相關註解請點下面 ... ... <看更多>