由高教公民團隊製作、厚達212頁嘅《靴下無聲:香港警察侵犯人權報告》出街喇。本報告由多名政治學、歷史學、法律學者合作撰寫,旨在推動國際調查警暴,一於同佢開年👊👊👊
Progressive Scholars Group released the “Silencing Millions: Unchecked Violations of Internationally Recognized Human Rights by the Hong Kong Police Force”. Written by a team of political, historical and legal scholars, this 212-page report advocates for international inquiry for police brutality. Let’s give the police a “Happy New Year” 👊👊👊
【#警暴報告PoliceBrutalityReport】高教公民發表《靴下無聲:香港警察侵犯人權報告》,報告旨在記錄2019年6月至12月期間,香港警察如何違反國際人權準則。
Progressive Scholars Group released the “Silencing Millions: Unchecked Violations of Internationally Recognized Human Rights by the Hong Kong Police Force”. The report aims at documenting the violations of internationally recognized human rights by Hong Kong Police from June to December 2019.
📘英文報告全文English full report:https://docdro.id/0EA2Bhy
📗中文行政摘要Chinese summary:https://docdro.id/whd3Oxb
📒結論中文譯本Conclusion Chinese translation:https://docdro.id/RbumrSc
報告重點包括:
Main points of the report include:
• 本報告詳盡分類、討論和解釋香港警察如何在2019年示威中涉嫌違反國際法的執法準則、人權標準和各種國際規範。香港警察暴力之嚴重程度和規模,在已發達社會中極為罕見。
This report categorizes, discusses, and explains the possible breaches of international law of law enforcement (LOLE), international human rights laws (IHRL), and various international standards and rules by members of the Hong Kong Police Force during the 2019 Protests. Most important, the scale and intensity of the abuses committed by the Hong Kong Police Force have been unprecedented in developed societies.
• 由於香港政府和中國政府持續拒絕對警暴問題進行獨立調查,加上本地的監察制衡機制已被認為缺乏能力進行和意願調查,國際調查將是唯一出路。
Due to the HKSAR government and the PRC government’s refusals to launch any independent inquiry to police brutality, as well as the inability of the local check and balance mechanism to launch any meaningful investigation, international inquiry will be the only way-out.
• 本報告建議國際機構盡快展開調查,包括聯合國安理會、聯合國人權理事會、國際刑事法院、聯合國人權事務高級專員辦事處等等,這些機構都具備啟動獨立調查之權力。此外,自由世界國家應參考美國之《香港人權與民主法案》和《全球馬格尼茨基人權問責法》,調查和制裁違反人權之香港警官;英國亦應根據該國《2001年國際刑事法院法案》之權力,調查香港警隊中的英國藉警官。
This report recommended that the case should be investigated by competent international bodies such as the United Nations Security Council, Human Rights Council (UNHRC), or the International Criminal Court (ICC), or the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), as they are all empowered to launch independent inquires. In particular, Free World countries should follow the example of the United States to pass legislations similar to the “Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act” and the “Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act” so as to impose sanctions on those police officers who have violated human rights; the United Kingdom should also make use of its “International Criminal Court Act 2001” to initiate an investigation on the Hong Kong Police Force personnel who were British nationals.
國際調查,唯一出路!
International inquiry, the only way-out!
#香港警察 #警暴 #國際調查 #唯一出路 #同佢開年 #高教公民 #學術自主 #公民自強
#PoliceBrutality #InternationalInquiry #hongkongprotest #hkpolice #popo #policestate #fightforfreedom #standwithhongkong #ProgressiveScholars
-----------------------------------
🔎 認識「高教公民」:https://goo.gl/9xdVQ4
🙋 成為「附屬成員」:https://goo.gl/B70zam
🙌 成為「正式成員」:hkprogressivescholars@gmail.com
同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過8萬的網紅Jackz,也在其Youtube影片中提到,【學好中文的重要性】《愛.回家》誤導拾遺不報 對白:你拾遺不報,真是個好女仔。 無綫劇經常出現「蝦碌」鏡頭,前日播映嘅處境劇《愛.回家》又被眼利讀者發現對白出問題。 劇情講述律師宋禮勤(張振朗飾)同Terry(李偉健飾)同時追求Angel(趙希洛飾),呢集講佢哋送花同音樂會門票之餘,宋禮勤更落足...
police report中文 在 Charles Mok 莫乃光 Facebook 的最佳解答
【法政匯思就社會進一步動盪的聲明】
【Statement on Further Escalation of Social Unrest】
// 當體制構建不能保障市民應有的追索權,暴力兼「私了」必如落山流水跟著來,這已清晰可見。僅說無諾,何能「止暴制亂」?
// Where the system fails to provide proper recourse, vigilantism and violence proclaiming self-defence arise as simple cause and effect. Without any real commitment by the Government to de-escalate and defuse the political crisis, verbal condemnation and physical crackdown will do nothing to ‘stop violence and curb disorder’.
https://www.facebook.com/…/a.455221741311…/1474268236073377/
【法政匯思就社會進一步動盪的聲明】
【Statement on Further Escalation of Social Unrest】(Scroll for English)
1. 近日,警隊的行為就如國際特赦組織所言越見低劣。[1] 這皆因政府漠視其專家提供的建議,並以歇斯底里、毫無章法可言的策略回應持續的動盪。
2. 五個月來,政府持續容許以下情況發生,對警政問題及根本的政治危機藥石亂投:
a. 阻礙救護人員前往現場拯救傷者;[2]
b. 偏頗地處理強姦或酷刑對待被拘留人士的指控;[3]
c. 肆無忌憚地濫用武力;[4]
d. 以諸多藉口為警察的失控或報復行為辯解。[5]
3. 法政匯思強烈譴責警隊濫用武力,及其本末倒置、往往為社區添煩添亂的驅散示威者行動。警方在十一月十一日於香港中文大學(「中大」)、香港理工大學及香港大學等驅散非法集結及/或堵路行為的行動,指稱的事實根據惹人非議。[6] 在撰寫此聲明之時,警方甚至以催淚彈及橡膠子彈回應中大校長的善意,與學生發生激烈衝突,造成最少60人受傷及多人被捕。[7]
4. 歸根究底,現有的制度未能公正地調查涉及警務人員的刑事指控,乃是警民衝突的源頭。樂觀地看,這可能只是個別調查人員的疏忽;悲觀地看,這反映一種互相包庇的文化,可能已由員佐級警員到警務處處長、保安局局長甚至特首,滲透警隊及政府上下。無論是哪一個情況,這種警察橫行無忌的觀感已經令公眾對負責調查大部分罪行的警察的信任蕩然無存。這個缺口一開,刑事司法制度剩下非常有限的能力,處理失職警員。
5. 法政匯思繼續呼籲香港政府成立獨立調查委員會,調查包括六月份以來政府的治安管理手段。除了將肇事者繩之於法外,更重要的是全面檢閱香港警隊以達至結構上的改革。至今,特區政府對於這個明顯又實際的選擇不屑一顧,堅持讓一個缺乏監察權力的獨立監察警方處理投訴委員會(「監警會」)[8] 去調查警察投訴及內部調查科。這正正就是問題根源所在。
6. 監警會委派的國際專家組就這個問題發表《進展報告》。國際專家組與政府持相反意見。他們批評監警會在結構上欠缺全面調查權力,對監警會這一個輕型、監管式的體制是否能夠做出決定性的貢獻表示懷疑,更指出下一步的可能性諸如「委派一個享有所需權力的獨立調查機構以作更深程度及更廣泛的調查」,意味著一個獨立調查委員會。[9]
7. 對於近數星期暴力頻頻,政府沒有採取任何行動,只是堅拒示威者的訴求(包括成立獨立調查委員會),更稱他們為「人民的敵人」。[10] 警員們多月來非人化地濫稱示威者為「曱甴」。[11]
8. 法政匯思絕對不認同法外制裁。此立場於七月二十五日之聲明已表明。然而,當體制構建不能保障市民應有的追索權,暴力兼「私了」必如落山流水跟著來,這已清晰可見。僅說無諾,何能「止暴制亂」?
法政匯思
2019年11月15日
(PDF: https://tinyurl.com/tt2nzmr)
1. Police conduct has seen, in the words of Amnesty International, ‘another shocking low’ [1] in recent days as the Government ignored constructive feedback by its own experts and hysterically responded to the ongoing unrest without any rational strategy.
2. In particular, these allegations point to a wanton failure on the part of the Government to properly approach policing and the underlying political crisis, now in its 5th month:
a. Obstructing rescuers and ambulances from accessing the injured; [2]
b. Unfair handling of allegations of rape and torture in custody; [3]
c. Unapologetic excesses in its use of force; [4] and
d. Evasive defence of police officers acting impulsively or in retaliation. [5]
3. The Progressive Lawyers Group (the ‘PLG’) vehemently condemns the Police regarding their excessive use of force and dispersal operations which often create the chaos sought to be quelled. On 11 November, the police conducted operations in, amongst others, the Chinese University of Hong Kong (‘CUHK’), the Polytechnic University of Hong Kong and the University of Hong Kong to disperse unlawful assemblies and/or obstruction of traffic, [6] the factual basis of which has been doubted by many. As at the drafting of this Statement, as riot police responded to an olive branch by the CUHK Vice-Chancellor with tear gas and rubber bullets, severe clashes between students and riot police at CUHK are ongoing with at least 60 injured and dozens arrested. [7]
4. Nonetheless, the crux of the problem remains in the institutional failure to investigate criminal allegations involving police officers impartially. At best, it could be an omission by individual police officers in their execution of duty. At worst, it could be a culture that acquiesces and conceals wrongdoings affecting grassroot constables, the Commissioner of Police, the Secretary for Security and the Chief Executive alike. Whichever the case may be, this perception of impunity breaches the trust and confidence the public reposes in the police who are tasked with investigating most offences. With this link broken, there remains very limited recourse in the criminal justice system against rogue officers.
5. The PLG continues to call on the Hong Kong Government to appoint a Commission of Inquiry regarding, amongst others, the current approach to policing social unrest since June. Bringing wrongdoers to justice aside, the more important task is a holistic review on the Police Force and a roadmap to structural reforms. So far, the Government brushed aside this obvious and pragmatic option, insisting upon an inquiry by the Independent Police Complaints Council (‘IPCC’) [8] whose (lack of) oversight over the Complaints Against Police Office (‘CAPO’) is the very issue at the heart of the current saga.
6. Curiously, the International Expert Panel of the IPCC appointed for advice on that very inquiry seems to hold a contrary view. In their Position Statement Report of Progress, the experts pointed out ‘structural limitations in the scope and powers of the IPCC Inquiry’ and noted that ‘it remains to be seen whether a light touch, oversight body like the IPCC, can make sufficient progress to produce any decisive contribution…’ It also identified a possible next step such as ‘a deeper more comprehensive inquiry in a number of respects by an independent body with requisite powers’, alluding to a Commission of Inquiry. [9]
7. In response to the extraordinary brutalities these few weeks, the Government did nothing but maintain that it will not yield to the protesters’ demands (including an independent Commission of Inquiry) and call them ‘enemies of the people’. [10] It has not helped that the police have for months been blatantly using such a dehumanising term as ‘cockroaches’ to refer to protesters [11].
8. The PLG stands by our Statement on 25 July 2019 and does not encourage citizens to take justice into their own hands. However, it is obvious by now that where the system fails to provide proper recourse, vigilantism and violence proclaiming self-defence arise as simple cause and effect. Without any real commitment by the Government to de-escalate and defuse the political crisis, verbal condemnation and physical crackdown will do nothing to ‘stop violence and curb disorder’.
The Progressive Lawyers Group
15 November 2019
(PDF version: https://tinyurl.com/tt2nzmr)
police report中文 在 Sam Tsang 曾思瀚 Facebook 的最佳貼文
Google drive record of crimes against humanity by the HK government and its police system. https://drive.google.com/…/1sdbhvxkWSvbECROtK1XXB8HR-s94vrK…
[全部同我廣傳]話說,報告出街後,一直有人擔心我地個報告既片源會隨住時間會俾FB DEL晒。
好彩我地條BACKUP TEAM(好似得一條友)係海外已經盡量將D片一邊做一邊拷貝左。依家見佢已經公開左咁我都唔怕貼出黎。大家如果都想做BACKUP就自己鍾意DL幾多就幾多啦。有D可能都未及放落個報告度。但證據就係證據。上千條都唔出奇。
(我今朝問番美國人原來呢個係另一個片庫,同我地果個片庫唔同係另一個黎,sorry for the confusion)
連結:https://drive.google.com/…/1sdbhvxkWSvbECROtK1XXB8HR-s94vrKG?
***
報告全文網頁版:
https://www.hkpfreport.org/full-report
英文PDF:
https://drive.google.com/.../1pUkCW08HzHoQXdhZ98OFgM.../view?
中文PDF:
https://drive.google.com/.../1inNJvVvb7XqEvGLvp3KqZ1.../view?
TWITTER推文宣請入:
https://twitter.com/ellan_ou/status/1183998271074660352
中文版本—公眾試閱版—正文:http://bit.ly/32iru94
警隊涉嫌濫權資料(六/七月):http://bit.ly/31ciO2E
警隊涉嫌濫權資料(至八月十日):http://bit.ly/2IU8ZQB
英文版本—公眾試閱版—正文:http://bit.ly/2BfWGd3
警隊涉嫌濫權資料(六/七月):http://bit.ly/2ISgpnE
警隊涉嫌濫權資料(至八月十日):http://bit.ly/2OQ1sWW
警隊涉嫌濫權資料(至十月二日)http://bit.ly/33pQiw2
police report中文 在 Jackz Youtube 的最佳解答
【學好中文的重要性】《愛.回家》誤導拾遺不報
對白:你拾遺不報,真是個好女仔。
無綫劇經常出現「蝦碌」鏡頭,前日播映嘅處境劇《愛.回家》又被眼利讀者發現對白出問題。
劇情講述律師宋禮勤(張振朗飾)同Terry(李偉健飾)同時追求Angel(趙希洛飾),呢集講佢哋送花同音樂會門票之餘,宋禮勤更落足嘴頭讚Angel話﹕「你拾遺不報,真是個好女仔。」拾遺不報仲獲讚?
其實劇情係講,Angel日前喺員工餐廳執到宋禮勤個銀包,將佢交去保安室,故宋禮勤應該係話「路不拾遺」,而非「拾遺不報」。
張振朗接受《蘋果》電話訪問時,亦知自己出錯,佢話﹕「有人講咗畀我知,咁都講錯,好好笑。因為太似喇,當時自己冇留意到,唔關劇本事,係自己mistake,做演員應該要留意多。」咁除咗演員,其實製作部都要留意番。
@蘋果日報
http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/enews/realtime/20150312/53523374
相關惡搞影片:
警訊《由你話事cut巨獎》有獎 真係唔要? feat. 安德尊
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZB2ZTtCcZ0
警訊《呃住先》有票 梗係要?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uizDyqibT18
Clips source:
路不拾遺!
https://youtu.be/GNS634lfR-g
拾遺不報是好人....
https://youtu.be/8qq07UpHQBI
警涉偷 2 百元失款 剛做老竇
https://youtu.be/3H_iZB2EtvA
No copyright infringement intended.
All rights belong to TVB, ATV and RTHK.
Just for fun.
Help us caption & translate this video!
http://amara.org/v/W8mx/
![post-title](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/h7MUPH7HssQ/hqdefault.jpg)
police report中文 在 Taiwan Voice - [EN-中文] TWV REPORTS: Police knock on the... 的推薦與評價
[EN-中文] TWV REPORTS: Police knock on the wrong door at a KTV, met by occupants who know more about the law than they do Friday night at ... ... <看更多>