【清宿便能手】體積細小的腸道清道夫
#惟注意脂肪量不輕
#一日一湯匙就夠
#星期四食材
奇亞籽 vs 羅勒籽
辦公室同事最近枱頭都有一樽樽飲品,裡面有些黑色小點在浮浮沉沉狀似蝌蚪,原來愛美的OL同事在水裡加入了奇亞籽(Chia seeds),不少女士都視它為減肥神物,因為它泡水後會膨脹,吃下去有飽足感又有潤腸通便之效。外貌相近的羅勒籽(Basil seeds)也有相似效果,多數出現在台灣及泰式飲品中。雖然兩種種籽的好處多多,但要注意都是高纖食物,份量不宜過多,因為纖維過多也會引致便秘甚至腸阻塞。
奇亞籽(Chia seeds) — 是鼠尾草的種籽,形狀似芝麻,起源於中南美洲。奇亞籽含有豐富的水溶性膳食纖維及Omega3,泡水後會膨脹及產生黏膠狀物質,也有植物性蛋白質,有助延緩血糖上升速度、提供飽足感及潤腸暢便。進食奇亞籽後可能導致腹脹情況,脾胃虛弱人士不宜多吃;奇亞籽有降血壓作用,所以低血壓人士不宜食用。
羅勒籽(Basil seeds) — 又名蘭香子、明列子、山粉圓(即台灣叫的青蛙下蛋),是香草羅勒的果實,扁平褐黑色,加入水中煮會膨脹及產生黏膠狀物質,也就是水溶性纖維,亦含有蛋白質、鈣質及維他命。進食羅勒籽後可能導致腹脹情況,脾胃虛弱人士不宜多吃。
Chia seeds vs Basil seeds
You may have seen some colleagues have drinks with floating particles in it recently, especially ladies. They are actually chia seeds loved by ladies for weight loss purpose. Chia seeds expand when placed in water and creates a feeling of fullness when consumed and can also aid bowel movement. Basil seeds are similar to chia seeds in appearance with similar effects. You may find basil seeds in Taiwanese and Thai drinks. Although the benefits of these two seeds are numerous, it is important to note these are high-fiber foods, and too much fiber can lead to constipation and even intestinal obstruction. It is better to not eat too much.
Chia seeds- seeds of Salvia Hispanica, shaped like sesame, originated from Central and South America. Chia seeds are rich in soluble dietary fiber and Omega3. After soaking in water, they will expand and become a sticky substance. Chia seeds are a plant-based protein, which help to slow down blood sugar rate of increase, provide a feeling of fullness and loosens the bowels. Eating chia seeds may cause abdominal bloating so those with asthenic stomach and spleen should not have too much. Chia seeds can help to lower blood pressure so those with hypotension can not eat chia seeds.
Basil seeds- known as Jelly Tapioca Pearl in Taiwan, is the fruit of vanilla basil. They are flat shaped and brownish black in color. They will expand and become a sticky substance after boiling in water. It contains soluble fiber and protein, calcium and vitamins. Eating basil seeds may cause abdominal bloating so those with asthenic stomach and spleen should not have too much.
#男 #女 #我胖了 #減肥 #便秘
同時也有10000部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過2,910的網紅コバにゃんチャンネル,也在其Youtube影片中提到,...
「slow movement benefits」的推薦目錄:
- 關於slow movement benefits 在 CheckCheckCin Facebook 的最佳解答
- 關於slow movement benefits 在 Betsy Chen Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於slow movement benefits 在 譚文豪 Jeremy Tam Facebook 的最佳貼文
- 關於slow movement benefits 在 コバにゃんチャンネル Youtube 的最佳解答
- 關於slow movement benefits 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於slow movement benefits 在 大象中醫 Youtube 的最佳貼文
- 關於slow movement benefits 在 Slow vs Fast Reps for Muscle Growth (Science-Based) 的評價
slow movement benefits 在 Betsy Chen Facebook 的最佳貼文
I was off exercising for a good 15 years before I finally decided to start running. At that time, I was 31.
•
•
Starting to run again at 31 was tough. I could barely maintain a slow pace for a minute and that got me realising how weak my cardiovascular endurance was. Nothing is easy at the start, I had to stay consistent in my weekly trainings although they were tough. I started running with a running group and that helped as there were buddies who would run along with me.
•
•
There's a social movement #MoveIt150 happening and it recommends at least 150 minutes of MVPA (Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activities) a week. Activities like jogging, cycling, swimming are some of the recommended types. And in turn, this helps in promoting a better blood circulation in your body and also prevent heart diseases, among the many benefits of exercising for 150 mins a week!
•
•
Many people will say they are too tired to workout on a regular basis, but once you start keeping to a regular routine, the movements will actually boost your energy levels and that is what my workouts do for me. All you need is to set aside 30 minutes daily and you'll get yourself into momentum!
•
•
I try to include MVPA once every two days. What is your fitness story? Or how will you encourage me to do better in mine? :D Start your MVPA journey by finding out your preferred activity here: http://bit.ly/betsymoveit150
Photo Credits : @aiksooon
•
•
#sp #MoveIt150 #fitnesssg #fitfam #hpbsg
slow movement benefits 在 譚文豪 Jeremy Tam Facebook 的最佳貼文
【傑哥給香港人寫的《香港家書》】
Alan Leong Kah-Kit 梁家傑:
//梁家傑最後一次以公民黨黨魁身份給香港人寫的《香港家書》,點出香港走到當下分崩離析的主因,並指出當面對專制強權時香港人的兩種基本取態,分別是犬儒認命和赤子初衷。他寄望下一屆特首能處理好香港人哪被出賣和挫折感覺。傑哥望中共明白,要香港人能同心同德,要香港能政通人和,不是靠強權鎮壓;根據回歸時承諾香港人的「一國兩制,高度自治,港人治港」調整對港政策,貫徹落實香港人對回歸的想像和初衷,把張曉明和梁振英亂港之局撥亂反正,才是大道正途。//
《香港家書》連結:https://goo.gl/YqNnE6
傑哥最後一次以公民黨黨魁身份給香港人寫的《香港家書》,點出香港走到當下分崩離析的主因,並指出當面對專制強權時香港人的兩種基本取態,分別是犬儒認命和赤子初衷。他寄望下一屆特首能處理好香港人哪被出賣和挫折感覺。傑哥望中共明白,要香港人能同心同德,要香港能政通人和,不是靠強權鎮壓;根據回歸時承諾香港人的「一國兩制,高度自治,港人治港」調整對港政策,貫徹落實香港人對回歸的想像和初衷,把張曉明和梁振英亂港之局撥亂反正,才是大道正途。
要收聽梁家傑親自讀出《給香港的信》,請點擊以下連結:http://programme.rthk.hk/channel/radio/programme.php…
LETTER TO HONG KONG
Hon Alan Kah-kit LEONG SC
Leader, Civic Party
September 18, 2016
Dear Fellow Hongkongers,
This will be the last Letter to Hong Kong I wrote as Leader of the Civic Party. My term as a Legislative Councillor will end in just less than a fortnight’s time, on September 30. Looking back at my twelve years as a legislator, I am thankful for the trust you have reposed in me. I sought public office in 2004 so that I could do my utmost to uphold the Hong Kong System according to what Hongkongers had been promised by the Sino-British Joint Declaration and the Basic Law. And, in particular, I had wanted to see implemented in Hong Kong universal suffrage for election of the Chief Executive and all members of the Legislative Council. 1997 saw Hong Kong revert to a Sovereign that practises People’s Democratic Dictatorship, and autocracy is the order of the day in Mainland China. Without a local government that is fully accountable to Hongkongers, our long cherished freedoms and institutions like the Rule of Law, apolitical Civic Service and Independent Commission Against Corruption are bound to wither and cannot stay.
It is regrettable that the Chinese Communist Party (“CCP”), thus the Central People’s Government, has not honoured the One Country Two Systems constitutional order as promised by and enshrined in the Basic Law. One only has to remind oneself of the black and white letters of Article 22 to tell how flagrantly the Basic Law has been breached. The Article provides that
“No department of the Central People’s Government and no province, autonomous region, or municipality directly under the Central People’s Government may interfere in the affairs which the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region administers on its own in accordance with this Law.”
Only as recently as the Legislative Council Elections on September 4, interventions from Zhang Xiao-Ming, the Director of the Liaison Office of the Central People’s Government in Hong Kong, were rampant. The Liaison Office bent over backwards to make sure that people like Tse Wai Chun Paul, Yung Hoi Yan, Ho Kwan Yiu, Leung Mei Fun and Chow Ho Ding Holden were elected. Such manoeuvres had gone so far that cost the seats of Anti-Democracy incumbents Wong Kwok Hing and Tang Ka Piu from The Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions, the most ancient supporters of the CCP in Hong Kong. And, those blessed by the Liaison Office are not slow to show their gratitude by thanking Zhang Xiao-Ming for his support, as if these were normal business, and conveniently forgetting all about the non-intervention guaranteed by Article 22.
On the subject of the treachery of the CCP, how can Hongkongers forget about the White Paper published by the State Council on June 10, 2014 and the Resolutions of the National People’s Congress Standing Committee (“NPCSC”) on August 31? By the former, the CCP emphasized its total control over Hong Kong and the self-restraints this omnipotent sovereign had enticed Hongkongers into expecting was shattered by the stroke of a pen. By the latter, the CCP unequivocally denied to Hongkongers our right to elect the Chief Executive, with anyone allowed to stand.
Public outrage over the White Paper and the NPCSC Resolutions prompted the Umbrella Movement later in 2014. Thoroughfares in the heart of the city were occupied for 79 days. The Umbrella Movement has moved the world by showcasing how David can stand up against Goliath using peaceful means and by engaging in rational debates. Hongkongers have shown the world that giving in and foregoing principles is not the only option when facing up to the CCP. While it draws the world’s appreciation, the Umbrella Movement has to date failed to move the Beijing Leadership an iota towards fulfilling its promises made in the 1980s to Hongkongers in its bid to entice us to accepting reversion to Chinese Sovereignty.
During the past four years with C Y Leung as the Chief Executive, Hong Kong saw our society being torn apart and polarized. Such a divide is getting wider by the day and one doubts if it can ever be mended, at least so long as C Y Leung stays.
At one pole are cynics or pragmatists who have long resigned to succumbing to the CCP and reaping whatever benefits they can by dancing to its tunes or even second guessing what the Beijing masters would like to see them do. Many of them, now occupying key positions in government and the civil society, contribute to the daily deterioration of Hong Kong’s core values and corruption of Hong Kong’s key institutions.
At the other pole are childish and naïve souls who, following our more elemental instincts, refuse to forget our original intentions and wanting to see implemented the vision we have been promised, namely, One Country Two Systems, High Degree of Autonomy and Hong Kong People Ruling Hong Kong. We want our long-cherished freedoms and well-respected institutions to continue to flourish for the benefit of many more generations to come.
Personalities dictate our destinies. When coming face to face with the adversity of suppression and overwhelmed by an apparently unmatchable power, individuals do react differently. I certainly would love to see more of the naïve souls and less of the cynics. It is not just our personal destinies that are at stake; Hong Kong’s fate is in the balance.
Elections of the Sixth Legislative Council, which completed on September 4, broke many records. 58%, or 2.2 million, of our registered voters came out to vote, which is unprecedented. Legislators-Elect include Law Kwun Chung, Lau Siu Lai, Shiu Ka Chun and Cheng Chung Tai, who were core participants and very much involved in the 79 days of Occupy. Hongkongers have voted them into office so that they are properly mandated to continue fighting for a democratic Hong Kong, in the spirit of the Umbrella Movement. Besides, Chu Hoi Dick Eddie and Yiu Chung Yim have been civil society activists who see as their mission to deliver a fairer and more equal Hong Kong.
These six, together with other Democratic Legislators-Elect, have all openly declared frustration with what they are seeing of Hong Kong, and, to different extents and degrees, are advocating for Hongkongers to take charge of Hong Kong’s fate beyond 2047. The numbers of Democratic versus Anti-Democratic Legislators in the new Council will be 30:40. It will be politically impossible, or at least very unwise, for the CCP to ignore the voice of Hongkongers who have spoken through the ballot box and attempt to continue to suppress the Democratic Camp.
Engagement is the only reasonable way forward. The Civic Party has proposed a Hong Kong Affairs Conference, which should foot the bill in this connection and is worth serious consideration.
Just as I had told Zhang DeJiang, the President of the National People’s Congress, when we met a few months ago, the only way the CCP can prevent separatism from gaining popularity in Hong Kong is for it to deliver according to what has always been promised to Hongkongers by the Basic Law. If Xi Jinping stifles democracy even more, I can only predict that anger and frustration will grow, with separatist demands boosted.
Very soon, Hong Kong will elect 1,200 members to the Election Committee mandated to select the next Chief Executive who will assume office in 2017. The Democratic Camp is determined to win as many seats as practicable so as to be able to have a say in who is to be put at the helm for the next 5 years.
To me, Hong Kong has no luck at all if the incumbent stays on. He must go. Whoever is eyeing the top job must be able to deliver hope to especially the young, up-and-coming generations of Hong Kong and to mend the divided society with apt and timely messages capable of taking into account the public sentiments of betrayal and frustrations.
May I take this opportunity to wish you all the best and hope to continue to see you around. God Bless Hong Kong.
slow movement benefits 在 Slow vs Fast Reps for Muscle Growth (Science-Based) 的推薦與評價
Are Fast Reps or Slow Reps Better for Muscle Growth? ... The eccentric phase refers to the portion of the movement where the target muscle ... ... <看更多>